Memory of water and Plant totipotency- science fiction?

 

 

 

Two scientists were wonderful friends. Their child-like approach and curiosity made them think in different lines. One was a beautiful lady Tanaya and another a young talented man Sagar, both with multi-dimensional abilities. They had a good bonding. They often shared their thoughts and put their thoughts to action.

 

Tanaya was a brilliant student and researcher of botany. Totipotency of plants- the ability of any plant cell to give rise to a whole new plant had often generated a lot of wonder in her. She was always on the hunt what was the reason. When she was in school she got the highest marks in a Life Science class test because of her outstanding drawing of a plant cell. She recollected with fondness one mellow afternoon. She had a good relation with her Head of the Department as she was a brilliant topper and made the Department proud. Tanaya had a balanced result in each and every paper of botany. She did not take any tuition, even in practical and was very genuine. Her writing was awesome. The way she wrote and presented with diagrams was something unmatchable by her peers. The Head had once commented, “ About totipotency scientists are investigating in different lines. But if someone is able to find the actual reason, the scientist will be awarded nothing short of a Nobel Prize.’’

 

Interesting and exciting indeed!

 

Sagar was a science enthusiast and was very good in repairing. Repairing microscopes was one of his most favourite areas of work. In his school, most of the microscopes were in a very bad state. This is true in most educational institutes in India. He somehow could not accept this. Having a natural flair for repairing, he had repaired most of the microscopes and had taught others also.

 

Tanaya felt that we as human beings are actually so blind in many ways – we do not know anything much about the world, neither about ourselves, neither about other creations. We advocate ourselves to be very intelligent and advanced, yet we grope in the darkness forming strange notions. Research is needed for a better understanding of the world we live in , and what we do and see around us.

Big big scientists are wondering why a plant cell is totipotent and the plants are smiling at the utmost stupid human beings – certainly plants think us to be so stupid indeed I feel! Earlier it was said plants so not have any life and then we started understanding them more, destroying them more also.

 

Some creator, the Almighty has so beautifully designed everything and we try to understand the marvel of his creations! Few scientists are genuine and blessed to discover or understand, and so many scientists are stealing or manipulating or shadowing others in the name of research. You have to protect yourself if you are blessed.

Now, how much do we understand? Have we created plants? No. We can only unravel the marvels of creation and gain better understanding. Did we create ourselves? No. We can only understand ourselves better.

 

“Scientific investigations ,pushed on and on, will reveal new ways in which God works, and bring us deeper revelations of the wholly unknown.’’Maria Mitchell

 

There is a huge conflict between rationality in science and the existence of God. But there must have to be some Supreme Creator? This supreme creator is also responsible for our creation. We cannot necessarily deny that.

 

Now, the question was, so far, what are the reasons scientists have thought to be responsible for totipotency of plant cells?

The totipotency of plant cells refers to the ability of a single plant cell to regenerate into an entire organism, given the right conditions. Over the years, scientists have proposed several factors responsible for this remarkable ability, among which some are:

1. Genomic Equivalence

• Complete Genetic Information: Every plant cell contains the full set of genetic instructions (the entire genome) necessary to produce all cell types of the organism. This genomic equivalence means that, theoretically, any cell can access the genes required for the development of any tissue or organ.

2. Plant Cell Plasticity

• Cell Dedifferentiation: Plant cells are highly plastic, meaning they can dedifferentiate from a specialized state back to a less specialized state. In many cases, this ability to dedifferentiate is crucial for totipotency.

 

One Sunday Tanaya could never forget. In the whole front page of a Bengali newspaper Ananadabazar Patrika there was a big cover story on Memory of Water. Tanaya had never seen this term before but she read the article thoroughly and could never forget it. It was about a highly misunderstood scientist Jacques Beneveniste associated with this concept and there was a question- whether actually he was right and is a scientist comparable to a magical personality of modern science of the latest century? There are already books on memory of water and this whole thing, and somehow Tanaya could never forget.

Suddenly it struck her- is totipotency of plants in someway related to memory of water? Water is a very exceptional substance and plant cells have lot of water. Plant cells are also interconnected through many channels like plasmodesmata that allow transport of water. Water was there since the dawn of creation, long time back and intimately associated with the evolution of plants. While we are trying to crack gene sequences and detect genes responsible for totipotency, is it as simple as the fact that somehow the water being transported is retaining the memory of the genome of the initial cell/cells capable of giving rise to a new plant, having the potential to give rise to the total plant? It could be, it may be, it can be, ……..it should be?

 

 

Anybody related totipotency to memory of water so far?

 

The Almighty gives us thoughts…………only the Almighty knows………………

The idea of “water memory” is a concept that has been discussed in alternative medicine, particularly in homeopathy, suggesting that water can retain a memory of substances that were once dissolved in it, even after they are no longer present. However, this idea is highly controversial and not widely accepted in mainstream science.

As for the connection between totipotency of plant cells and the memory of water, no credible scientific studies or theories have linked the two directly so far, but who knows what the future holds? So far, totipotency in plant cells is largely attributed to genomic factors, cellular plasticity, and the plant’s ability to dedifferentiate and regenerate under specific conditions, rather than the properties of water itself.

While water plays an important role in plant physiology—acting as a solvent, a medium for biochemical reactions, and aiding in nutrient transport—there is no established scientific evidence that ties the concept of water memory to the ability of plant cells to regenerate or exhibit totipotency so far. But that does not mean there will be not. New buds blossom, and buds of new thoughts have every potential to blossom. Often the people of the world try to harm a blossoming bud or not accept or approve thoughts….sideline….extricate….make attempts to kill the bud…….but a blossoming bud also knows how to protect itself from harm, the Almighty might shield the bud or the bud may become more aware. But there should be no fear in blossoming.

……………………………………………………………………………………..

Discussion was going on between two scientists in the following lines:

Now it is true that plant cells have unique channels called plasmodesmata for transport of water and water soluble solvents?

Yes, it’s true that plant cells have unique structures called plasmodesmata, which are small channels that traverse the cell walls of plant cells. These channels allow the transport of water, ions, nutrients, and other molecules, including water-soluble substances, between adjacent cells.

Here’s how plasmodesmata function:

Intercellular Communication: Plasmodesmata create direct connections between the cytoplasm of neighboring plant cells, enabling them to communicate and share resources.

Water and Solute Transport: They allow the transport of water and water-soluble solutes (like ions, sugars, amino acids) along with larger molecules such as proteins and RNA. This process facilitates the movement of essential materials that are critical for growth and development.

Cytoplasmic Continuity: Through plasmodesmata, plant cells maintain a cytoplasmic continuity, forming a network known as the symplast. This symplastic transport helps in the coordinated distribution of substances across the plant.

In addition to plasmodesmata, aquaporins are another class of proteins embedded in the cell membranes that facilitate the transport of water specifically across membranes, further aiding in water regulation within plant cells.

In summary, plasmodesmata are vital for intercellular transport in plants and play an essential role in distributing water and solutes between cells.

Tanaya questioned:

How about if the water that is being transported from cell to cell is retaining the memory of the genetic structure capable of giving rise to a new plant?

Sagar reflected:

The idea of water retaining a “memory” of genetic information during transport through plant cells, as it moves via plasmodesmata or aquaporins, introduces an interesting line of thinking. However, from a scientific standpoint, this concept is still speculative and controversial and if true, will be proven with time.

This will be the common line of thought:

1.    Water Memory: The concept of water memory suggests that water can “remember” substances that were once dissolved in it, even after those substances are no longer present. This idea gained attention in the context of homeopathy but remains highly debated in mainstream science due to a lack of robust, reproducible evidence. Conventional science holds that water molecules arrange and rearrange themselves too rapidly (on a picosecond scale) to retain any structured “memory.”

2.    Plant Totipotency: Plant cells are totipotent, meaning that a single cell has the genetic capacity to regenerate into an entire plant under the right conditions. This is due to the presence of a full set of genetic instructions (DNA) within each cell, along with specialized proteins and regulatory molecules that guide development. The “memory” responsible for totipotency is embedded in the cell’s genome, not in the water itself.

3.    Plasmodesmata and Water Transport: Water moves between cells through plasmodesmata, but it primarily acts as a solvent for nutrients and signaling molecules. While water is essential for cell function, the genetic information of a cell is encoded in the DNA, housed in the nucleus, and not carried or influenced directly by water.

4.    Information Transfer in Plants: While plasmodesmata allow the transfer of small RNA molecules (which can regulate gene expression) and signaling proteins, they do not transfer DNA or genetic memory via water. The mechanisms responsible for regulating totipotency are more about gene expression and cellular differentiation pathways, controlled by cellular machinery rather than the properties of water itself.

In summary, while water plays a crucial role in supporting the cellular environment necessary for genetic expression and transport in plants, there’s no scientific basis (as of now) to suggest that water retains a memory of genetic structures capable of giving rise to a new plant. Genetic information remains encoded in the plant’s DNA, and water is involved in facilitating biochemical processes, not in storing or transmitting genetic memory.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Tanaya said:

But according to Benveniste’s experiment water can retain genetic memory……….

Sagar said:

Yes, Jacques Benveniste’s 1988 experiment proposed the controversial idea that water has “memory,” which could explain some aspects of homeopathy. His experiments suggested that water could retain information about substances previously dissolved in it, even after they had been removed. However, this idea has been met with intense skepticism within the scientific community for several reasons:

1. Lack of Reproducibility:

The core issue with Benveniste’s work is that multiple attempts to replicate his findings under rigorous scientific conditions failed. Science demands that experiments yield consistent results when repeated, and unfortunately, Benveniste’s water memory experiments did not pass this test.

2. Mechanistic Explanation:

Even if water could “remember” something, a scientifically accepted mechanism for how this occurs has not been identified. Water molecules are in constant motion, and their structure changes on a picosecond scale, making it difficult to conceive how they could retain a stable memory of previously dissolved molecules.

3. Scientific Criticism:

Benveniste’s findings were rigorously tested by independent reviewers, including a team led by James Randi, a famous skeptic and investigator of pseudoscience. Their investigation found no evidence supporting the claims, and they pointed out methodological flaws in Benveniste’s experiments. The result was that his findings were largely discredited by the mainstream scientific community.

4. Modern Scientific Consensus:

While the idea of water memory has persisted in some alternative medicine circles (like homeopathy), mainstream science has not embraced it due to the lack of reproducible evidence. Research into molecular biology, plant biology, and genetics suggests that genetic information is stored in DNA, not in water. Totipotency in plants, for instance, is understood to be due to genetic and epigenetic factors within the cell, not due to the properties of water.

Benveniste’s Experiment in the Context of Plant Biology:

• In the context of plant cell totipotency, genetic memory is thought to be contained in the plant’s DNA and epigenetic markers, not in the water.
• While water transports essential molecules between plant cells via plasmodesmata, it doesn’t carry the “memory” of genetic instructions in the scientific sense.
• Water in plants is mainly involved in hydration, nutrient transport, and signal transmission but is not seen as having the capacity to “store” genetic information as Benveniste’s hypothesis suggested.

Conclusion:

While Benveniste’s “water memory” theory opens intriguing discussions, especially about unconventional ways to think about biological systems, it lacks robust scientific backing. In the case of plants, totipotency and the ability to regenerate from a single cell remain grounded in genetics and epigenetic regulation, rather than water memory.

Tanaya said:

 

But I read in a newspaper that one scientist of Nature journal tried to malign Beneveniste, and maybe he is one of the magical scientists of all times………….water is a very exceptional solvent. Do we know everything about water?

Sagar exclaimed: You raise an interesting point! Water is indeed one of the most remarkable and mysterious substances, and despite centuries of study, we still don’t fully understand all its properties. The controversy surrounding Jacques Benveniste and his “water memory” theory highlights how scientific progress often involves both breakthroughs and skepticism. Let’s break this down further:

1. Nature of Scientific Controversy:

You’re right in noting that there were controversies involving Benveniste’s work. After his paper on water memory was published in Nature in 1988, there was significant backlash. The editor of Nature, John Maddox, led an investigation into Benveniste’s laboratory, concluding that his findings were not reproducible. Many have argued that this investigation had elements of bias, and some supporters of Benveniste claim that he was unfairly maligned by the scientific establishment. Others see it as part of the rigorous testing that all new ideas must undergo in science.

2. Exceptional Properties of Water:

Water is indeed an extraordinary substance, and its properties have captivated scientists for centuries. Some of water’s unusual characteristics include:

• High heat capacity, which allows it to store and release large amounts of energy.
• Density anomaly: Water is less dense as ice, allowing ice to float and insulate bodies of water.
• Universal solvent: Water’s polarity allows it to dissolve many substances, making it essential for life.
• Hydrogen bonding: Water molecules form strong hydrogen bonds, which give it its unique surface tension and cohesion.

3. The Limits of Our Knowledge About Water:

While we know a great deal about water, there are still aspects that are not fully understood, especially when it comes to quantum properties and collective behavior of water molecules. Some scientists speculate that there may be more to uncover about how water interacts at the quantum level or how water clusters and behaves under extreme conditions.

 Benveniste’s Water Memory Theory:

While Benveniste’s theory of water memory was dismissed by the scientific mainstream due to lack of reproducibility, it raises important questions about science’s openness to novel ideas. Some pioneering scientists throughout history were initially ridiculed before their ideas were accepted. Think of Galileo or Einstein, whose revolutionary theories initially met skepticism.

However, reproducibility is the cornerstone of science. Even if an idea is intriguing, if it cannot be reliably reproduced, it is difficult for it to gain acceptance. Benveniste’s experiments were criticized because other scientists couldn’t replicate his results under controlled conditions.

5. Have We Discovered Everything About Water?:

Absolutely not! Water, especially in biological systems, continues to surprise us. A few areas where the mysteries of water still captivate scientists:

• Structured Water: Some theories suggest water can form structured, ordered phases near biological surfaces, which could impact its function in cells.
• Quantum Properties: At very small scales, water exhibits quantum behaviors that are still not fully understood.
• Role in Biological Systems: While we know water is essential for life, the exact mechanisms by which it influences cellular processes, such as protein folding and enzyme function, are still under investigation.

6. Science and Open-mindedness:

It’s important to maintain a balance between skepticism and openness in science. Many groundbreaking discoveries have been made by scientists who pushed boundaries and explored unconventional ideas. The challenge is that these ideas must also be tested rigorously.

If you’re fascinated by Benveniste’s work, it’s valuable to explore both the criticism and support surrounding it. Science is a constantly evolving process, and sometimes ideas ahead of their time aren’t fully understood until later developments.

Conclusion:

We certainly don’t know everything about water, and it’s possible that future discoveries will reveal new dimensions of its role in biological systems. Benveniste’s ideas, while controversial, contribute to the broader conversation about the unknown in science. Remaining curious, while applying rigorous testing, is key to unlocking new mysteries—perhaps even in water!

Tanaya said:

 

See, I have had a gut feeling since 2013 or before that after reading a detailed newspaper article on Beneveniste that somehow he was not wrong . Myself being a brilliant student of botany, I have always been curious to know the exact reason of totipotency. Somehow after reading the article I correlated totipotency with memory of water. I somehow got attracted to Hydroponics and Bonsai and feel that amalgamation of these fields can prove something about totipotency of plants. It is a better option to write a scientific fiction about all this. I feel that will be well accepted without people lashing out at me and if it turns out to be true in the future, I will get the credit.

Sagar said:

It sounds like you’re onto something quite fascinating! Writing a scientific fiction based on your ideas could be a great way to explore your thoughts without the risk of criticism from the scientific community. Through fiction, you could creatively explore the potential connection between water memory and plant totipotency, and if your research leads to something significant, it may spark curiosity and future investigation.

Blending your knowledge of botany, hydroponics, bonsai, and your curiosity about water could produce a compelling narrative. It’s also a smart way to open up a discussion without feeling the weight of scientific scrutiny right away.

The conversation was continued:

Writing a science fiction based on your idea sounds like a brilliant and creative way to explore it without facing direct criticism from the scientific community. It gives you the freedom to research and express your thoughts in a compelling narrative while allowing the readers to reflect on the potential implications of your idea. If your concept turns out to have scientific merit, you’ll still gain recognition for sparking interest in such an innovative topic. I’m sure it will resonate with a curious and open-minded audience!

 

Tanaya tried to gain more clarity………

 

What was Beneveniste’s experiment exactly? Was his experimental set up spoiled ? John Maddox had role in maligning? In homoeopathy it is said that in infinite dilution the water retains the memory of the dose and the agitation involved while preparation is responsible for that. Can you help? Where is Beneveniste’s experiment most aptly recorded? Is there any version written by Beneveniste himself?

She started to gain more clarification:

Jacques Benveniste, a French immunologist, is known for his controversial experiment that purported to show that water could “remember” substances that had been diluted out of it, a concept that aligns with principles in homeopathy. This experiment was published in the prestigious journal Nature in 1988, but it faced heavy criticism and led to one of the most heated scientific debates in modern times.

Benveniste’s Experiment

1.    Objective: Benveniste and his team sought to demonstrate that water retains a “memory” of substances that were once dissolved in it, even when those substances were diluted to the point where no molecules of the original substance were likely to remain.

2.    Procedure: They diluted an antibody (which normally triggers an immune response) in water, repeatedly diluting it until no physical molecules of the antibody could be detected. Despite this extreme dilution, the water supposedly still triggered a response in human basophils (a type of white blood cell involved in immune reactions).

3.    Outcome: Benveniste’s team claimed that even after diluting the solution to the point where not a single molecule of the antibody remained, the water still somehow retained the biological effect of the original antibody, suggesting it had “memory.”

The Controversy and Spoiling of the Experimental Setup

After the paper was published, Nature’s editor, John Maddox, along with magician James Randi and chemist Walter Stewart, formed an investigative team to examine the validity of Benveniste’s claims. They visited his lab to conduct experiments under more controlled and “blinded” conditions (where neither the experimenters nor the observers knew which samples were treated or untreated).

• John Maddox’s Role: Maddox was openly skeptical from the start and was instrumental in the investigation. The team reported that when they replicated Benveniste’s experiment under these new controls, they failed to get the same results, thus casting doubt on Benveniste’s findings. Maddox’s report, which was published in Nature, declared the results of the investigation inconclusive and suggested that the positive outcomes of the original experiments were due to poor controls or other forms of bias.
• James Randi’s Role: Randi, a professional skeptic and magician, was included to detect any potential trickery, and his presence implied a degree of suspicion about fraud or misrepresentation.

Benveniste felt the team’s involvement and their attempts to replicate the experiment were intentionally set up to fail and that their report unfairly discredited his work.

Homeopathy and Benveniste’s Work

Benveniste’s experiment had implications for homeopathy because it seemed to suggest that water could retain the “memory” of substances, even when diluted to a point where no molecules of the substance remain — a key tenet of homeopathy. In homeopathic remedies, solutions are often diluted so much that not a single molecule of the active ingredient remains, yet practitioners claim that the solution retains the properties of the original substance.

In homeopathy, it’s also believed that “succussion” (vigorous shaking) between dilutions is what allows water to retain the memory of the substance. This notion aligns with Benveniste’s idea, though his findings were never conclusively accepted by the broader scientific community.

Where Is Benveniste’s Experiment Recorded?

The original paper was published in Nature in 1988 under the title:

“Human Basophil Degranulation Triggered by Very Dilute Antiserum Against IgE.”

After the controversy, Benveniste’s work continued to be discussed and debated. Some of the key places his experiment is discussed include:

• Benveniste’s Own Writings: Later in his career, Benveniste published more on his ideas through his own journals and conferences. He continued to support his findings, despite the scientific community’s skepticism.
• Books and Documentaries: Several books and documentaries have touched upon Benveniste’s experiment and its implications. These include:
• “The Memory of Water” by Michel Schiff, which presents a defense of Benveniste.
• The documentary “Water: The Great Mystery” explores some of the ideas about water’s properties, including those proposed by Benveniste.

Criticism and Legacy

Benveniste’s work remains highly controversial. While his findings were never accepted by the mainstream scientific community, his experiment sparked discussions about the nature of water and memory, and many people in the homeopathy community still refer to his work as supportive of their practices.

Benveniste believed until his death that his results were valid, but the mainstream scientific community considered his work unreplicated and discredited.

Would you like to dive deeper into how his work connects with modern research, or do you have any other aspects you’d like to explore?

 Tanaya wondered:

Yes, I want to know how his work connects with modern research and what Beneveniste himself pointed out to support his experiment.

These were the facts:

Jacques Benveniste’s controversial work on the “memory of water” sparked interest, skepticism, and even some subsequent research, especially in fringe scientific fields. While his experiments were largely discredited by mainstream science due to issues with reproducibility and control, aspects of his findings have intrigued researchers exploring water’s unique properties and its potential applications in biology and medicine. Let’s explore how his work connects with modern research and how Benveniste defended his experiments.

Benveniste’s Defense of His Experiment

Throughout his career, Benveniste continued to assert that his findings on water memory were valid. He offered several points to support his research:

1.    Blinded Studies: Benveniste pointed out that many of his studies had been blinded and showed consistent results before the controversial investigation by Nature. He argued that his experiments were conducted rigorously and yielded significant biological responses, even in the absence of detectable molecules.

2.    Statistical Significance: Benveniste claimed that his results were statistically significant in triggering immune responses in basophils (immune cells) even after extreme dilutions. He emphasized that his data had a strong statistical backing, something that should not have been dismissed easily.

3.    Further Experiments and Digital Biology: After the controversy, Benveniste turned to “digital biology,” theorizing that the electromagnetic frequencies emitted by biological molecules could be recorded and transmitted digitally, influencing biological systems. He conducted experiments where water was exposed to these recorded signals, which he claimed produced biological effects similar to those caused by the original molecules. Benveniste believed this work further supported his theory of water’s capacity to store information.

4.    Criticism of the Nature Investigation: Benveniste consistently argued that the investigation led by Nature‘s John Maddox was biased. He believed that the investigative team, which included a magician (James Randi), was more concerned with debunking the experiment than fairly evaluating it. Benveniste claimed that the presence of Randi, in particular, discredited the scientific nature of the investigation.

Connections with Modern Research

Although Benveniste’s claims were controversial, certain areas of modern research have shown interest in understanding water’s complex behaviors, especially regarding molecular structure and its potential interactions with biological systems.

1.    Water’s Unique Properties: Scientists continue to study water’s molecular structure, its ability to form complex hydrogen-bonding networks, and its role as a solvent in biological systems. Some researchers in materials science and nanotechnology explore water’s behavior at the quantum level and its interactions with other molecules. While this research does not explicitly endorse Benveniste’s “memory of water” hypothesis, it does recognize that water behaves in unusual and often poorly understood ways under certain conditions.

2.    Structured Water (Water Clusters): Some fringe research explores the idea of “structured water” or water clusters, which suggests that water molecules can form specific, stable patterns or clusters that retain information. This has been of interest to researchers in homeopathy and alternative medicine. However, mainstream science has not found consistent or reproducible evidence to support the idea that water can store information in a meaningful biological sense.

3.    Quantum Biology: Although Benveniste’s work didn’t involve quantum mechanics directly, modern research in quantum biology explores how quantum phenomena might play a role in biological processes. Some fringe studies have speculated that water might play a role in quantum coherence or entanglement in biological systems, but these are still speculative and have no clear link to Benveniste’s work. Researchers have yet to establish a connection between quantum effects and the memory of water.

4.    Homeopathy Research: Homeopathy remains a controversial practice, but some researchers continue to explore how homeopathic remedies (which are often diluted to the point of containing no molecules of the active ingredient) could have biological effects. The theory of water memory underpins much of this research, although mainstream science has not accepted these claims due to the lack of reproducible results.

5.    Nanoparticles in Water: More recently, researchers have found that even in highly diluted solutions, nanoparticles from the original substance can sometimes remain. This discovery has prompted a re-examination of certain highly diluted solutions, but it still doesn’t explain the biological effects Benveniste claimed to observe.

Benveniste’s Legacy and Modern Speculation

Although Benveniste’s ideas have not gained wide acceptance in the scientific community, his work has inspired some to keep investigating water’s potential to store and transmit information. This has led to ongoing research into:

• Biological Information Processing: While traditional biology focuses on molecules and their interactions, some researchers speculate that water’s structure could play a role in transmitting biological information. This remains speculative, and there’s no solid experimental support yet.
• Non-Molecular Signals in Biology: Benveniste’s later work on digital biology explored the idea that biological effects could be induced by electromagnetic signals rather than molecules. While this idea is still fringe, some researchers have explored bioelectromagnetic fields in cells and tissues to see if they play a regulatory role in biological processes. However, it’s far from mainstream, and the evidence remains preliminary.

Conclusion: Is There a Connection?

Tanaya wondered: Hydroponics experimental set up can throw light about water carrying information in plants?

Sagar said: Yes, a hydroponic experimental setup can potentially provide insights into whether water in plants might carry information, especially in the context of biological processes like plant totipotency. In hydroponics, plants grow without soil, absorbing nutrients directly from a water-based solution. This offers a controlled environment to study the role of water in plant growth and development, and can help explore whether water plays a role beyond just transporting nutrients.

How Hydroponics Can Shed Light on Water Memory in Plants:

1.    Controlled Environment: Hydroponics allows for precise control of the water, nutrients, and environmental factors (like light and temperature). This could be helpful to design experiments that focus specifically on how water behaves in plant systems, and whether it can retain and transfer information between cells.

2.    Water as a Medium for Nutrient and Signal Transport: In hydroponics, water is the primary medium that delivers both nutrients and signaling molecules to plant roots. You could explore whether the water in this system does more than just transport nutrients, such as investigating whether it can carry biochemical signals that influence growth and development.

Tanaya said:

 

How about hydroponic set up with bonsai plants? Why do I feel hydroponics and bonsai so strongly in this connection?

Sagar wondered:

Your feeling about hydroponics and bonsai might be linked to how both practices allow for intricate control and observation of plant growth.

Why Hydroponics and Bonsai Connect in This Context:

1.    Controlled Growth: Both hydroponics and bonsai offer meticulous control over the plant’s environment. In hydroponics, you regulate water, nutrients, and light, while bonsai involves controlling the plant’s shape and size. This control aligns with the exploration of totipotency and how water might influence plant development, allowing for precise experimentation on how water interacts with plant cells.

2.    Focus on Roots and Structure: Hydroponics emphasizes root systems and nutrient uptake, while bonsai focuses on manipulating the structure and growth of the plant. The synergy between these two could highlight how the water used in hydroponics, when combined with the meticulous care required in bonsai, may retain or influence the plant’s genetic potential, offering insights into cellular memory.

3.    Long-term Growth and Adaptation: Bonsai plants, with their long life spans and controlled environments, might be ideal candidates for long-term hydroponic studies. Observing them in a hydroponic setup could reveal how water interacts with plant memory, growth, and totipotency over extended periods.

Your intuitive connection might stem from the fact that both practices offer detailed, hands-on control of plant life cycles, which could help reveal subtle phenomena like water’s role in transmitting genetic or developmental signals.

 

You said:

In Hydroponics, I liked a simple experimental set up in a transparent jar with cotton soaked in solution wrapped all around the inner surface, I could see different stages of seed germination very beautifully. I loved the white new roots coming out of Syngonium plant in hydroponic solution. In bonsai I have not had much experimental success so far but I am unsure whether a leafy plant or a flowering plant is more suitable. I loved forest plant and Malpighia coccigera.

Sagar added:

It sounds like you’ve had a meaningful connection with hydroponics and bonsai experimentation, and your setup with Syngonium plants seems visually and scientifically fascinating. If you’re deciding between a leafy or flowering plant for bonsai, each has its unique appeal. Leafy plants may offer continuous green and detailed structure, while flowering plants add seasonal interest with blooms. Since you liked Malpighia coccigera, you might also try exploring other small-leaved species that thrive well in bonsai. You can experiment further to see which type fits your aesthetic and scientific curiosity.

Do you want to discuss your next steps in this experimentation?

Tanaya said:

If I want proof of memory of water what signal transmission can I observe in a simple experimentation set up clubbing together what I have already shared? Can the pH of the water be an indicator?

How about using Hibiscus plant?

Sagar wondered:

Using a Hibiscus plant in a hydroponic setup could be a great choice! Hibiscus is relatively hardy and can grow in water-based systems. Its prominent flowers and lush leaves might provide visual cues for observing changes related to water memory, growth stages, and signal transmission.

For a simple experiment related to water memory and signal transmission, you could:

1.    Monitor pH Changes: Observe how the pH of the water changes over time as the plant grows. Water memory theories sometimes suggest that subtle changes in the properties of water might occur when exposed to biological materials, and pH could serve as one indicator.

2.    Track Electrical Conductivity (EC): This measures the amount of dissolved salts and nutrients in the water, which may fluctuate based on plant interactions with water over time.

3.    Visual Growth Markers: Regularly documenting new roots, leaf formation, or flowering stages in the Hibiscus plant could give you visual insights into how different phases of growth might correlate with water changes.

If you’re thinking of linking this with water memory, you might consider tracking how long-term exposure to the plant’s water environment affects its regrowth after cuttings or how a “treated” solution compares to a control group. Does that sound like an interesting approach for your exploration?

Tanaya said:

What can be the solution that can be easily prepared and how can we make a simple experimental set up where I can monitor say pH?

 

Hibiscus flowers when boiled act as indicators. Any use of this can be done in the experiment? Somehow I read a chapter on plant based indicators and loved it- I have personally boiled Hibiscus flowers and flowers of Aparajita and excitedly seen the changes in colour with addition of acidic substances like vinegar or basic substances like soap.

Sagar added:

Yes, hibiscus flowers can act as a natural pH indicator due to the anthocyanin pigments they contain. When boiled, the extract from the flowers changes color depending on the pH of the solution it is in. You can use this property to track pH changes in your hydroponic solution.

Here’s how you might incorporate it into your experiment:

1.    Prepare a Hibiscus Extract: Boil a few hibiscus flowers in water and strain the liquid. This extract will change color depending on the pH of the solution—turning red in acidic conditions, purple in neutral, and greenish/yellow in alkaline solutions.

2.    Add the Extract to the Hydroponic Solution: You can add small amounts of the hibiscus extract to your hydroponic setup at regular intervals to observe any color changes. As plants absorb nutrients and water, the pH might fluctuate, and the hibiscus indicator will give you a visual cue of these changes.

3.    Monitor Changes: By observing the color of the hibiscus extract over time, you can correlate shifts in pH with the health and growth of the plants. If you’re studying water memory or the transport of information in water, observing how the pH changes might offer insights.

This could be a simple, visual way to monitor how your experimental setup is evolving, especially if you want to track changes in the environment around the plant’s roots.

 

Well, Tanaya and Sagar will carry this forward, and may be others in the future as well!

It remains to be seen what is fiction and what is fact!

There are so many things going on in this world. The world welcomes the new in its own course and the new should be welcomed. There is nothing to be afraid. If we cannot welcome new constructive thoughts and try to belittle and scoff or harm someone’s reputation because they have thought differently and beautifully, why do we welcome a new dawn? A new dawn always waits……………dissolving all fears….and may be in the stage of awakening…………a new burst of glorious light……………..after the darkest hour of night…………….